Join the Real Truth About Health Membership Club!

 
We know you might not have time to watch all 120 hours of the onstage lectures, panels, and off-stage interviews from the 2020 Real Truth About Health Free 10 day Conference.

We have the perfect solution to get you all the information in a fraction of the time.
Join The Real Truth About Health Membership Club for $7 a month or $75 a year (worth $500 a month or more) to get these life-changing benefits for you, your family, and friends.
GET STARTED TODAY!
 
PEACE OF MIND FOR ONLY $7/MONTH or $75/Year
Step #1: Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:

Secure Payment

All orders are through a very secure network. Your credit card information is never stored in any way. We respect your privacy...
Step #2: Check out
Item
Price
$7 Per Month
$75 per year
Credit Card Number:
CVC Code:
Expiry Month:
Expiry Year:
Item
amount
Dynamically Updated
$XX.00

32 of the world’s top authors, telling you the unbiased, accurate, scientifically proven truth about health, nutrition, the food system, the medical system and the environment.

1 - Get the replay of all 80 onstage lectures, panels, and off-stage interviews (every second of the conference) with our 32 world-renowned authors from the January 25 - February 2, 2020, Real Truth About Health Conference. All 120 hours. 

These authors are experts in health, nutrition, the food system, the medical system, and the environment. This includes every single on stage and off stage presentation.

2 - Get approximately 1000 short videos made from the original 80 full-length videos. 

Not everyone wants to watch all 120 hours of the conference, yet you want to make sure you don’t miss anything essential or life-saving. These shorter videos focus on a specific point made during the lecture. This way, if during the 90-minute lecture, a speaker makes a particular point, we would make a short video with a title explaining what the video is about. Now you have 1000 very specific short videos with exact titles to make this easier for you to find your information.

3 - Get the 10-minute highlight of every one of the 80 full-length lectures so you can get the most critical information in a fraction of the time.
This way, you can quickly get the main points of each lecture without having to listen to the whole 90-minute talk. You can also sample different speakers to see which you enjoy enough to watch their full lectures.

Want to get all the information in a fraction of the time?
4 - We provide the full transcription of all 80 full-length lectures for those who prefer to read instead of watch videos.
We know you are busy. You can just read the transcript instead of watching the video.

5 - We provide you with the top 20 points from each lecture in writing. 

This is perfect for people who want to read what was taught in every presentation quickly and don’t want to have to watch 120 hours of video. We sum up the top 20 points for each of the 80 full-length lectures.

6 - Get topic videos. We went through all 120 hours of content and broke all the information into 35 different specific categories. 

For example, some of the titles of the 35 categories are Cancer, Diabetes, Dementia, Heart Disease, Bone Diseases, Obesity, GMO’s, Climate Change, wireless radiation, plus many more. This way, for example, if you're only interested in Diabetes, we have one video that aggregates all the times that the speakers spoke about Diabetes. This way, you get all the Diabetes information without having to watch all 120 hours. We made 35 main topics to make it easier for you to find what you're looking for.

7 - Get the 120 main points of the conference. We went through all 120 hours and pulled out the most critical 120 points to keep you and your family healthy, smart, educated, and safe. 

This way, you learn the actual action steps you need to take right now to stay healthy. We get right to the bottom line with what to do and show you the videos that support each point. We take all the speakers that made this point so you can see all the data to support each point. For example, if a speaker says Vitamin B-12 is critical in preventing dementia, we will take all the video from any of the 32 speakers that support this. That means you get one video with everyone who commented on vitamin B-12. This makes you feel more confident than you would be if you just heard one doctor's opinion.

This is the ultimate product you want. The bottom line action steps to take based on the whole conference. There are lots of conferences but who has time to watch them all? We instead watch it for you and pull out the bottom line action steps to take.
Need to Spread this Information to Someone You Know?
8 - Ability to share all the videos with family and friends

9 - Ability to download audio of all 80 full-length lectures

10 - Compilation videos by age and male/female. If you just want content focused on your age and sex, then you can watch our summary videos that have content specifically for your sex and age range. 

For example, we have separated the content for a woman under 40, women over 40, men under 40, men over 40. This way, you can focus just on the vital information that pertains to you.

11 - Monthly newsletter on the top 100 news stories in the fields of health, nutrition, the food system, the medical system, and the environment.
Why do I need to be up to date on health and environmental information?
To save your life, prevent disease, prevent nutritional deficiencies that affect the organs in your body, to avoid pain, and to prevent losing physical and mental functions. Also, to prevent substantial medical bills for you and your family, to prevent having to submit and deal with reimbursement of medical bills, to prevent having to take off from work, to prevent losing time with your loved ones. No one should wait until they have a health challenge to take health seriously. The time to learn about prevention is while you are healthy. The best way to deal with a disease is to prevent it. You have far more options if you deal with health now, not later when you are in compromised health. The same goes for the environment and food supply. The best time to deal with these issues is now, not in the future, when we are in a crisis. We have more options now then we will if we let the environmental problems get bigger.
So I went back to the drawing board, started crunching our numbers, and figured out that our average cart value was ONLY about $32. 
One of the doctors from the conference claims that with the right diet and lifestyle, you can be heart attack proof. Does he explain this?
The doctor's name is Caldwell Esselstyn, M.D, he is the author of Prevent and Reverse Heart Disease. He fully backs up his claim with two compelling studies that he conducted, oversaw, and followed up with all the patients. 
As you can guess, that put us on a new mission. 
Another author from the conference conducted the most comprehensive large study ever undertaken of the relationship between diet and the risk of developing disease. Did he find anything important? 
The author's name is T. Colin Campbell. He conducted a study and then later wrote a book about it called The China Study, which The New York Times said The study can be considered the Grand Prix of epidemiology. He found that eating a lot of protein, especially animal protein, is also linked to chronic disease.
Another three authors claim we need to be aware of the relationship between cell phone radiation and health issues as well as the future risks from 5G wireless. What proof do they have? I have previously read that there was no risk from cell phones or 5G.
The authors who spoke about this were Devra Davis, Theodora Scordato, and Danial De Baun. They all cited detailed scientific papers showing the relationship. You need to see for yourself the evidence and studies that they have. Devra served as the President Clinton appointee to the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board from 1994 to 1999. She has also authored more than 190 publications in books and journals ranging from The Lancet and the Journal of the American Medical Association to Scientific American and The New York Times. You must hear what she is saying about these topics instead of just listening to the media repeat what the telecom issue has told them.
I understand that Walter Willett, M.D., known as the world’s most-cited nutrition researcher, says that our diet is having an impact on climate change. Why does he say this?
Yes, Dr. Willett Willett, professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, who co-authored the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems said that he is working with colleagues in the earth sciences to understand further the ways that dietary choices can affect greenhouse gas production and climate change. It is critical to your future health, business decisions, investing decisions, job selection, and understanding of the future to learn precisely what he means when he explains how certain foods are dramatically increasing climate change.

Many of the doctors and authors said that obesity and type 2 diabetes were lifestyle diseases that could be prevented and reversed. Is this based on their opinion or solid science?
Solid science, these authors have worked with real people for many years to accurately measure what does and doesn’t prevent obesity and type 2 diabetes.
Of the 32 authors that you use as the source of information, how many are medical doctors?
We have many great authors, scientists, researchers, naturopathic doctors, and dieticians. We also had nine medical doctors. The medical doctors included
Joel Fuhrman, M.D. - "The End of Heart Disease: The Eat to Live Plan to Prevent and Reverse Heart Disease,"
Caldwell B. Esselstyn Jr., M.D - "Prevent and Reverse Heart Disease: The Revolutionary, Scientifically Proven, Nutrition-Based Cure,"
Walter C. Willett M.D. - "Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy: The Harvard Medical School Guide to Healthy Eating,"
Garth Davis, M.D. - "Proteinaholic: How Our Obsession with Meat Is Killing Us and What We Can Do About It,"
 Dr. David Katz - "The Truth About Food: Why Pandas Eat Bamboo, and People Get Bamboozled,"
Joel K. Kahn M.D. -"The Plant-Based Solution: America's Healthy Heart Doc's Plan to Power Your Health,"
 Milton Mills, M.D,
Gabriel Cousens, MD, MD(H), DD - "There Is a Cure for Diabetes, Revised Edition: The 21-Day+ Holistic Recovery Program",
Matt McCarthy, M.D. - "Superbugs: The Race to Stop an Epidemic"

Why do I need to get health information from The Real Truth About Health? I can just get it directly from companies in the industry. Right?
A lot of companies don’t want your shopping habits to change. They can’t afford for your shopping habits to change. Therefore they don’t want you to change your beliefs about health because that might cause you to alter your buying behaviors. They want you to keep doing, thinking, shopping and spending the way you always have, even if that means keeping you misinformed or confused. The fossil fuel industry doesn’t want you to switch to solar and wind energy. The sugar industry doesn’t want you to stop eating sugar. The pesticide industry doesn’t want you to stop applying weed killer to your lawn. The wireless phone industry doesn’t want you to be concerned about cell phone radiation. Industries spend a lot of time trying to convince you that their products have way more positives than negatives. They say whatever they need to say to convince everyone to keep buying their products even if it means your health or your planet's health will be hurt. 

I already know that? What is your point?
Our point is that although many people know this, they don’t fully accept how intense the attempt is to keep you brainwashed, confused, and uninformed. Companies and industries want to make money, and they do not want you to stop buying their products. They spend all their time and money to try and convince you that the science, the studies, the clinical trials, the experts, the collective knowledge, is that you should buy their products and that their products have way more benefits than risks. They don’t love you, and they don’t care about the long term effects their products have on you, your children and the planet. They care more about profits than whether their product causes a disease. If their product has anything to do with the 50% decrease in sperm counts that we have had over the last 50 years, they don’t want you to know. If their product is dramatically increasing climate change, they don’t want you to know. If their product is causing or increasing the chance of you getting Obesity, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, or dementia, they don’t want you to know. 

I hear the mainstream media and big industries criticize anyone that doesn’t agree with them. They call them quacks, charlatans, snake oil salespeople, and scam artists. They claim the information on the internet is not trustworthy. They tell you that you are irresponsible, dumb, and gullible if you listen to anyone but them. Is this true?
Industries sometimes call potential competition to their industry quacks when in some cases, the people they are calling charlatans have valuable information that could save lives. They often call them quacks to discredit them because the new product or industry threatens them.  

I don’t listen to companies. I only listen to the scientific community, the medical industry, the universities, and the clinical trials, so I feel confident that I have good information.
You are mistaken to assume these sources have accurate information. The medical industry knows how much you like and trust your doctor, so they spend billions of dollars trying to influence the design and outcome of the clinical trials that your doctor reads. They also try to control which articles appear in the medical journals that your doctor reads. 

How could the smart, honest people I trust be tricked into believing misinformation from big industries?
Many ways. Companies that don’t want you to know the actual effects of their products do everything they can to confuse, misrepresent, distort, trick, and fool the people you trust. That is why when a study or clinical trial comes out saying a product is safe or suitable for you; you need to know who paid for the study. Also, who was involved in the study, who designed the study, who monitored the study, who interpreted the study results, who reported on the study results, what the study was compared to, etc. The average news reporter isn’t scientific or devoted enough to fully understand if the research they are reporting on was done correctly and for the benefit of humanity. Most reporters don’t have months of time and proper access to critical information to properly investigate and understand the studies that industries report on. The great myth is that science is independently funded and not influenced by industry. This is why scientific studies and clinical trials(Read Ben Goldacre’s book “Bad Pharma”) are so questionable because unbiased, unaffiliated sources are not doing them.

I understand that I am not getting accurate health and environmental information from big companies, but why do I need to get information from The Real Truth About Health membership club? Why can't I just get health and environmental data from the newspaper, Tv news, or my favorite website?
The primary source of revenue for the media is advertising. They don’t want to do investigative reporting that might reflect poorly on their advertisers. They avoid doing negative stories about the companies that are the primary source of their revenue. Even when they do a negative story, they don’t keep following up on the issue. 

I am not sure I fully accept this. There are many honest journalists.
Yes, there are, but they don’t necessarily have the approval from their management to go after stories that might expose big companies(their advertisers) and their products.

During the presidential debates, didn’t the journalists ask tough questions?
They did, but they also left out many topics that would offend the advertisers of their network. No one asked about GMOs, the overuse of pesticides, about why sperm counts are down 50% in the last 50 years, why childhood diseases have skyrocketed, why the control of our seeds is in the hands of just a few companies, about the dangers of wireless radiation and 5G. No one questioned any part of the food, medical, chemical, telecom, biotech, or chemical industries. Over and over, they asked other questions and avoided the exact topics that could make their advertisers look bad. 

Even if the media and journalists don’t hold big industries accountable for providing the public with factual information on the benefits and risks of their products, don’t government agencies do that?
No. The most critical agencies like the EPA (environmental protection agency), the FDA(Food and drug administration), the USDA(United States Department of Agriculture), the FCC(Federal Communications Commission) and most others are often run by someone formerly from or loyal to the industry they are supposed to be protecting the public from. The head of these government agencies is appointed by politicians who often take campaign contributions from these industries during their election campaigns. Then after the election, the newly elected senator or congressman or president selects an industry-friendly person to run the government agency. That person makes industry-friendly policies, even if they are bad for your health or the planet. These agencies continue to provide inaccurate, non-scientific, biased information to protect the industry they are from. The media then quotes the policies and information from these agencies, and now the whole country is operating with wrong, inaccurate, dangerous pro-industry information. This means the media, the politicians, the universities, the governors, the scientific community, the medical industry is all giving out inaccurate information that they were told came from an unbiased government agency. The problem is the source of information that everyone is using is not accurate. So even the experts have inaccurate information. The public has no chance and is bombarded with the wrong information about what is safe, healthy, and scientific. The public believes all the confident, smart, hard-working people sharing this information but doesn’t realize that in many cases the information started from a government agency that probably is biased in favor of protecting the industry even if that means harming your health or the planet.
Can you give me an example of this?
The most powerful agency overseeing the health of the environment is the Environmental Protection Agency. The current head of that agency is Andrew Wheeler, a former coal lobbyist with Close ties to the coal industry. Before Trump nominated him to become deputy EPA administrator last fall, Wheeler was a lobbyist at Faegre Baker Daniels Consulting, where his best-paying client was the coal mining company Murray Energy. The company paid Wheeler’s firm at least $300,000 each year between 2009 and 2017, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Murray Energy’s CEO, Robert Murray, has been a loyal supporter of Trump. After giving $300,000 to the President’s inauguration fund, the New York Times reported that Murray gave Trump a wish list of environmental regulations he wanted rolled back. The President instructed Pruitt to get to work on the list.
Wheeler also had a number of other high-profile clients in the energy sector, according to the Washington Post. Many of these companies have an interest in the regulations Wheeler will now make decisions about as acting head of the EPA.
Wheeler worked for Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe
During his time as a congressional staffer, Wheeler worked as a senior aide to Republican Sen. James Inhofe, one of Washington’s most prominent climate change denialists, according to the Post. Inhofe expressed his support for his former staffer, calling Wheeler “the perfect choice” to serve as acting EPA administrator.
I realize the media and government agencies have biased information, which is why I get all my medical advice from a medical doctor, pharmacist, or the pharmaceutical industry. Doesn’t that guarantee I get the truth?
No, the doctors, nurses, medical advisors, and public policy experts are making recommendations based on the results of clinical trials. The problem with this is that there are ways to set up clinical trials to make them look more favorable to a particular drug or medical procedure then they are. Making a statement about a treatment based on the results of clinical trials is risky since many clinical trials only show the good results from the trials and leave out the bad results. Also, clinical trials are sometimes done for very short periods of time. We don’t know the long term effects of a pharmaceutical drug or medical procedure when a clinical trial lasts only a few months. Despite the lack of useful long term information on the effectiveness and safety of prescription drugs and medical procedures, they are widely recommended to the public with assurances from the pharmaceutical industry that they work well and are safe to use. Just like other industries that sell products, the medical industry is very focused on selling products. Medicine is a product that makes a lot of money for a lot of people, just like breakfast cereal, candy, beer, canned soup, office supplies, tires, or any other consumer products. Just like these other industries, some shareholders want to increase sales and profits regardless of what impact it has on your long term health. You don’t want to get your nutrition information from the shareholders of the fast food, soda, snack food, or breakfast cereal industry. You don’t want to get your medical knowledge from the shareholders of Pharmaceutical companies. In all these cases, the shareholders push the board of directors to push the CEO to push his employees to optimize profits above accurate health information that might cause sales to decrease. In all cases, the goal of the company is to convince the public to buy more of whatever they are selling, regardless of the long term implications of the product.
But my doctor is fantastic, smart and up on the latest trends. Isn’t he an expert?
Yes, he is fantastic, smart, honest, hard-working, and up on the latest trends. However, if he is reading medical journals that are pro-industry regarding clinical trials, then he doesn’t know the long term side effects from the prescription drugs studies in these clinical trials. Maybe he has his own opinion from doing this for a long time, but when someone gets sick, it's hard to know if the cause of their illness was influenced by foods or drugs that you took 15 years ago. In other words, the constant assurances from the medical industry that their products work well and don’t have long term side effects are often inaccurate since the clinical trials were not done long term, so there is no way for the doctor to say the prescription drugs are safe long term confidently. That is why large, long term, unbiased tests, and trials would be so valuable. Yet, they are intentionally not done because no company wants to learn bad things about their products.
I am sure my doctor has the lastest, greatest information on health and wellness; after all, he is a medical doctor.
Unfortunately, medical schools don’t do a good, thorough or in-depth job of teaching doctors about nutrition, nutritional supplementation with vitamins and minerals, exercise, herbal medicine, alternative medicine, fasting, saunas, grounding, traditional Chinese medicine, emotional health, and every other non-mainstream approach to health. Shouldn’t your health advisor know all the best, most effective approaches to health? Why do they only know about western medicine, which favors drugs and surgery but not diet and lifestyle? The reason your doctors are not taught these other things is that they are not a profitable business for the medical industry. The medical industry says these other things don’t work. Still, there is a significant amount of documented science showing diet, lifestyle, and different holistic approaches to health work well for many health issues for far less money and with far fewer side effects. The medical industry doesn’t want you to consider anything except what they sell. This is not in your best interest.
Hasn’t it been proven that modern medicine has extended lives and saved millions?
The United States pays and uses the most modern medicine. Our life expectancy among countries ranks about 43rd, which is not good considering how much less medicine many of the countries with higher life expectancy than us use. Something about our food system, medical system and high chemical toxic lifestyle is not working if we are 43rd yet spend twice as much as the next closest country on healthcare. Our food plays a role as well, but the main point is that something is causing us to have worse health than 42 other countries who all spend far less on health than we do. 
I get my information from university studies. Isn’t that good?
Sometimes, but if the university is receiving money from industry, then they often produce very biased information that doesn’t reflect your best interests. The public is not getting accurate information when government agencies, politicians, and the media quote a biased university study.
If the big industries, government agencies, media, universities, clinical trials, and scientific community are influencing the information I am getting on health and the environment, where do I get accurate information on how to stay healthy in the short and long term?
You need to find a source of information that doesn’t make money from a source that they then promote. If someone says the best product for health is vitamin D, and then they sell vitamin D, then their credibility is in question. It doesn’t mean vitamin D isn’t good just because they promote and sell it. However, the overall consensus is that people and companies don’t like to criticize their products. Also, since companies need to make money, they often oversell the benefits and downplay the negatives of the products they sell. Therefore it is critical not to get seduced by confident, good looking, well-credentialed salespeople even if they claim they are not salespeople. You need to find sources of information that are looking out only for you and not for the product they are selling or the company that is paying them.
Why is The Real Truth About Health different?
As long as we continue not to sell products, we can remain unbiased. The fact that we sell nothing allows us to just offer you impartial information to the best of our ability.
Isn’t it a conflict that you have some advertisers?
Yes, If we promote our advertisers, that is a conflict. We are trying our best to give you pure unbiased life-saving information. To the degree that we take advertisers, there is potential for conflict. While we are trying not to let advertisers bias our data, we believe our credibility is highest if we had no advertisers. At this time, to cover costs, we still have advertisers and acknowledge that it does compromise our credibility. We still believe that we are providing you the best information, but we hope to get to the point when we can be completely advertiser free. 
So, who should I listen to when it comes to health and the environment?
You shouldn’t underestimate how biased most sources are. You need to find sources that have no financial incentive to distort the information. The ideal person would be your mom or dad if they had expertise in health and the environment. You need sources that are on your side and only looking after your best interests. 
So it's the big industries that are at fault in providing misinformation, unhealthy products, environmental damage, and resource depletion?
Misinformation is the result of companies wanting to prevent you from getting accurate information that might cause you to stop buying their products. However, industries are not the only culprit. Remember, companies are just a bunch of employees who report to the chief operating officer who reports to a chief executive officer who reports to a board of directors who try to satisfy the investment community, which consists of funds from peoples IRA’s, 401k’s and other investments. As long as the public cares about investment returns more than how a company treats people’s health and the planet, we will keep having companies trying to make money at any cost, including the survival of the earth and our health.
Why do I need to join the membership club? I already know how to be healthy?
It’s more than just knowing information; if you are still doing the thing that is bad for your health, then there is a good chance that you don’t fully understand how much and how fast you are negatively affected by the bad habit. Many people don’t recognize the time frame of when their unhealthy lifestyle habits will impact them. People have been brainwashed by a lifetime of commercials, convincing you that unhealthy habits aren’t that big a deal. It’s the goal of the big industries to convince you that their products aren’t harmful to you as long as they are used in moderation.
I’m sure everything will be fine, someone else will take care of me or fix me if I get sick?
Unfortunately, this is not true. Your best chance for a long healthy life is to maintain your health. Waiting to get sick and then thinking that there are lots of great cures is not accurate. Getting sick is painful, expensive, time-consuming, interferes with your life, interfering with friends and family, and prevents you from working and living your healthy life. The only rational solution is to stay healthy and prevent disease. This might be your goal, but it is in direct conflict with the goals of corporate America, which want to sell you more of what they are selling. You being truly informed is interfering with their purpose of selling more of their food, medicine, chemical, GMO, or other products. They need you to stay uninformed, confused, and loyal to them, to keep their sales up. 
What impact can I possibly have? Why should I gather accurate information on health and the environment?
You can change the world. If you take your new information and tell one person a day the truth, then at the end of one year, 365 people will know the truth. If each of those people tells one person a day, then at the end of year two, the 365 people will have told 365 people. Now 133,225 will know. If each of those people tells one person a day, then 48,627,125 people will know at the end of year three. If each of them tells one person a day, then at the end of year 4, seventeen billion people will know. Since there are only 8 billion people on the planet, everyone will see this information in just a few years or less.
What's the rush? I’m very busy and don’t have time to change my lifestyle. Why should I change when I like my life the way it is?
You can do whatever you want, but there are consequences to your choices. No one is making you stop smoking. You can smoke as much as you want, but you should know the truth about exactly what the health impacts are from long term smoking. Again, before making decisions that could be life or death decisions, get all the accurate information, not the data that companies want you to have. You must hear the truth about what impacts your health. You also want to know what is happening to our planet, our food system, our oceans, our soil, our biodiversity, our wildlife, our insects, our freshwater supply, and more. However, how are you going to get this information when the media and politicians and the scientific community are financially influenced to keep you misinformed. If you were informed, you might take action, change habits, vote differently, think differently, act differently. Big industries want you to keep buying their products and not help you learn the truth. They also don’t want you to realize how urgent some of these issues are. If they can convince you that everything will be fine for another 25 years, then most people won’t take action. The problem is some of these issues need to be addressed now not in 25 years.
A lot of rich, smart, famous, good looking, well-credentialed people seem to be doing just fine, and they aren’t focused on a healthy diet and lifestyle, why should I?
The statistics are staggering and getting worse. While a small percentage of smokers might do okay, in the long run, most do poorly. This is the same for poor diet and lifestyle. There might be a 106-year-old with bad habits, but for the most part, a healthy lifestyle provides much more high-quality pain-free years to your life. Don’t be fooled into thinking otherwise. Learn now what to do to maintain your health, and learn it from people who have no plan to mislead you or sell you something.
Don’t you believe in everything in moderation?
Not when it comes to things that are mathematically and scientifically proven to shorten your life and make your remaining years less healthy and more problematic. There is no place for moderation when it comes to proven health destroyers. There is no need for moderation when it comes to tobacco, heroin, cocaine, drunk driving, and other hazardous habits. People who say everything in moderation want you to buy their dangerous products and are often trying to manipulate you with language to shame and guilt and persuade you. There is no such thing as moderation with dangerous or life-threatening habits and foods. If there were, we wouldn’t have an adult population with nearly 40% obesity and a third with Diabetes or Pre-Diabetes.
What is so special about these 32 speakers?

We searched the world for unbiased experts who not only studied their subject matter for very long periods but also had no financial agenda. These are people who like you are truth seekers and just wanted to learn and share the truth about health and the environment. We looked at thousands of people before inviting these speakers to be part of our conference.
Maybe you're making this out to be a bigger deal then it is. My parents never worried about this. Why should I be concerned about health, my parents' generation wasn’t.

Right now, a young man or woman who wants to start a family has to consider things their parents never had to. Autism rates have shot up from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 36 during the past 60 years. There also has been a 50% decrease in sperm count in the last 50 years, dramatic increases in childhood obesity, asthma, attention deficit disorder, and allergies. 54% of children have some developmental disorder compared with 12% just 40 or fewer years ago. 
I am concerned about the health of my organs like my thyroid, kidneys, lungs, liver, heart, pancreas, adrenals, as well as my bone density and skin. How will this help me?
Everyone is concerned about their internal organs, bone density, and skin. The best way to take care of them is to be proactive and focus on prevention. You must learn the foods, nutritional supplements, and lifestyle choices that support the optimal functioning of these organs. If you wait until they aren’t functioning well, then you are forced to use medicines that might not be effective and will often have side effects. Being proactive by learning what keeps your organs healthy is everything. 
 I don’t care much about topics like climate change, water shortages, genetically modified foods, low sperm counts, bees and pollinators dying out, wireless radiation, dangers of 5G wireless. They don’t affect me, right?
Wrong, anyone who cares about health, money, and understanding the future must fully understand exactly what are the facts about each of these issues and many others. If you don’t get educated by unbiased sources, you might miss the trends, invest incorrectly, mistreat your body, and put your health at risk. Stop getting taught by tv commercials, tv news, magazines, medical websites, and science that is paid for by advertisers. 
Okay, sounds good, but now is not the time for me. I am busy with other stuff.
It has never been more urgent to understand what is happening in the world of health and the environment. It is flat out reckless, dangerous, and unfair to yourself to not get immediately informed on this life-saving information. Stop waiting; we have no time to waste when it comes to protecting your health and the environment. Learn about what you need to do to maintain your health now. Don’t wait until you are sick. 
It still seems like there is nothing I can do to stop my genes from doing what they do, right?
No, all the latest science says your lifestyle choices, not your genes are the main factor in your health. Also, some decisions cause irreversible damage. If this was the year 1920, and you were uninformed about the health risks of tobacco, you might have contributed to your premature death. Now in 2020, not knowing about the latest information in health and the environment might dramatically contribute to health problems or premature death.
It still seems like there is nothing I can do to stop my genes from doing what they do, right?
No, all the latest science says your lifestyle choices, not your genes are the main factor in your health. Also, some decisions cause irreversible damage. If this was the year 1920, and you were uninformed about the health risks of tobacco, you might have contributed to your premature death. Now in 2020, not knowing about the latest information in health and the environment might dramatically contribute to health problems or premature death.
What if I don’t like the membership club? 
You can cancel at any time, and we will stop charging the $7 a month. We think this membership is worth $500 a month or more, but we want to reach a broad audience, so we made it affordable. 
I am still not sure if it's a good use of my $7 a month. 
Even if you don’t want to spend the money for you, do it to support us so we can continue educating millions of people around the world. We would be very grateful for your support.
Are there any other important reasons to learn this information and join the membership club?
Yes, we are being threatened by many severe health and environmental issues. We pray that everyone will immediately get educated on these issues and start rapidly spreading the word so we can change the future trajectory of these issues. We need everyone involved to solve these challenges.
What are the specific health and environmental issues you are concerned about that make you feel so strongly that everyone learns the information offered in the membership club?
Health Issues
Cancer Crisis - Lifetime Risk of Developing or Dying From Cancer
Males 39.66%, Females 37.65%
Source American Cancer Society

Childhood obesity rates rise 10-fold since the '70s
A new report has looked at worldwide obesity rate trends over the past four decades. It found that obesity in children and teenagers is ten times higher now than it was in 1975 and that five years from now, more will be obese than underweight.
Source medicalnewstoday.com

6 IN 10 adults in the United States have a chronic disease. 4 IN 10 adults in the United States have two or more chronic diseases
Source Centers For Disease Control

Chronic kidney disease, or CKD, causes more deaths than breast cancer or prostate cancer. It is the under-recognized public health crisis. It affects an estimated 37 million people in the U.S. (15% of the adult population; more than 1 in 7 adults), and approximately 90% of those with CKD don't even know they have it. 1 in 3 American adults (approximately 80 million people) is at risk for CKD.
Source National Kidney Foundation

Diabetes Goes from less than 1% in 1958 to 9.4% in 2017. New CDC report: More than 100 million Americans have diabetes or prediabetes
Sources Centers For Disease Control Division Of Diabetes Translation, National Diabetes Statistics Report, Centers For Disease Control And Prevention

Nearly half of Americans have heart disease, study says. According to the study from the American Heart Association, 121.5 million Americans, or about 48.5 percent, dealing with heart or blood vessel disease as of 2016. The study says deaths from cardiovascular disease rose from more than 836,000 in 2015 to more than 840,000 in 2016. Findings were published in the peer-reviewed AHA journal Circulation.
Source USA Today

High Blood Pressure Crisis for 1/3 of adults
Percent of adults aged 20 and over with hypertension (measured high blood pressure and/or taking antihypertensive medication): 33.2% (2015-2016)
Source Centers For Disease Control

Nearly 40% of adults had obesity in 2015–2016 up from approximately 10% of U.S. adults who were classified as obese during the 1950s
Source Association of American Medical Colleges and livestrong.com

By 2020, one in two Americans over age 50 is expected to have or be at risk of developing osteoporosis of the hip; even more, will be at risk of developing osteoporosis at any site in the skeleton
Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General.
 Due primarily to the aging of the population, the prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass is expected to increase. By 2020, one in two Americans over age 50 is expected to have or be at risk of developing osteoporosis of the hip; even more, will be at risk of developing osteoporosis at any site in the skeleton.
Source The National Center for Biotechnology Information

Sperm Count in Western Men Has Dropped Over 50 Percent Since 1973
Total sperm count among Western men fell 59.3 percent from 1973 to 2011, according to new research.
The sperm count of men in Western countries has been declining precipitously with no signs of “leveling off,” according to new research, bolstering a school of thought that male health in the modern world is at risk, possibly threatening fertility.
Source New York Times

Autism Rate Rises to 1 in 40 Children from less than 1 in 10,000 in 1930
Source webmd.com

84,000 Chemicals on the Market, Only 1% Have Been Tested for Safety
Like the FDA, the EPA is similarly toothless when it comes to protecting the public from dangerous chemicals. Though it has the power to investigate some consumer chemicals through the Toxic Substances Control Act, the agency can act only if a chemical poses an "unreasonable risk" to public health—and that is difficult to prove. Since the TSCA was passed in 1976, the EPA has only tested around 200 of the 84,000 chemicals on the market.
Source eco watch

Roughly 13,000 chemicals are used in cosmetics alone, of which only 10 percent have been evaluated for safety, and new ones are introduced every year
Ordinary household products can be significant sources of chemical exposure that add to your body’s toxic load.
Source vegan magazine

He added that if 5G deployments aren't stopped, "we [as a society] are playing around with our very survival.
Martin Pall, a professor emeritus of biochemistry and basic medical sciences at Washington State University,
He added that if 5G deployments aren't stopped, "we [as a society] are playing around with our very survival."
Source cnet.com

Exposure to polluted air is like smoking a pack a day, study says
Long-term exposure to air pollution, especially ground-level ozone, is like smoking about a pack of cigarettes a day for many years, a new study says. Like smoking, it can lead to emphysema. The study, published Tuesday in the medical journal JAMA, is the largest of its kind. It looked at exposure to air pollution -- specifically to ground-level ozone, fine particulate matter, nitrogen oxide, and black carbon. The study looked at more than 7,000 adults ages 45 to 84 for over a decade in six US metropolitan areas -- Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, St. Paul, Minnesota, and Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Air pollution may have killed 30,000 people in a single year, study says
Source CNN

An estimated 22.7% (54.4 million) of adults had doctor-diagnosed arthritis
Source Centers For Disease Control And Prevention

Nearly a third of FDA-approved drugs had problems, study finds
(CNN)Patients might think the US Food and Drug Administration's stamp of approval means that a product is the last word on safety. Still, about a third of the drugs, the FDA approved between 2001 and 2010 were involved in some kind of safety event after reaching the market, according to a study published Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The authors found that in that time, 222 novel therapeutics were approved, and there were 123 postmarket safety events involving 71 products that required FDA action.
needed to add 61 boxed warnings, also commonly called a black box warning, to call attention to serious or life-threatening risks.
Source CNN

The Rise of Chronic Illness in Children: The Terrifying Truth
The prevalence of disease and disabilities is on the rise, and the numbers of the rise of chronic illness in children are terrifying.
1 in 3 is overweight
1 in 6 has learning disabilities
1 in 9 has asthma
1 in 10 has ADHD
1 in 13 has food allergies
1 in 20 has seizures
1 in 42 males has autism/1 in 68 has autism
It starts to be accepted as the new normal, but the deterioration of our children’s health and the rise of chronic illness in children is not normal. About 43% of those under the age of 18 suffer from at least one chronic condition. 54% of all children have a chronic illness or are overweight.
That’s more than 1 in 2. What are we waiting for, the rise of chronic illness in children to become 1 in 1
Source mamavation.com

Major Depression Rates Surge
Major depression cases in America are climbing rapidly, according to a study of medical claims by the health insurance group Blue Cross Blue Shield.
The report, titled “Major Depression: The Impact on Overall Health,” found that diagnoses of major depression swelled by 33 percent between 2013 and 2016, based on data from more than 41 million Blue Cross Blue Shield members. The total of commercially insured Americans suffering from major depression has topped 9 million, according to the research.
Source everydayhealth.com

Lyme disease predicted to rise in the United States as the climate warms
"A sizable increase in the incidence of cases of Lyme disease in the United States due to climate change is imminent," says Edson Severnini, assistant professor of economics and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University's Heinz College,
Source science daily

Survey finds 55% of people regularly take prescription meds—four drugs on average
Do Americans Take Too Many Prescription Medications?
Survey finds 55% of people regularly take prescription meds—four drugs on average
Source consumer reports

According to the Alzheimer’s Association’s Facts and Figures report, an estimated 45% of American seniors 85 and older suffer from Alzheimer’s, and 1 in 10 people aged 65 and over
Half of the adults aged 85 and over have Alzheimer’s.
According to the Alzheimer’s Association’s Facts and Figures report, an estimated 45% of American seniors 85 and older suffer from Alzheimer’s, and 1 in 10 people aged 65 and over (10%) has Alzheimer’s disease. It is the most common cause of dementia among older adults.
Source www.aplaceformom.com

Experts predict that in just over 30 years, by around 2050, antibiotic resistance is going to kill more people than cancer and diabetes combined.
Globally, antibiotic-resistant superbugs kill up to 700,000 people a year. Experts predict that in just over 30 years, by around 2050, antibiotic resistance is going to kill more people than cancer and diabetes combined. That means a rise to 10 million people killed by superbugs by then.
Source interestingengineering.com

The decline in the Nutritional Value of Crops
Several studies of fruits, vegetables, and grains have suggested a decline in nutritional value over time, but the reasons may not be as simple as soil depletion. There is considerable evidence that such problems may be related to changes in cultivated varieties, with some high-yielding plants being less nutritious than historical varieties. Several other issues are involved, like changes in farming methods, including the extensive use of chemical fertilizers, as well as food processing and preparation.
Source New York Times

Prominent Doctors Are Not Disclosing Their Industry Ties in Medical Journal Studies. And Journals Are Doing Little to Enforce Their Rules
“The system is broken,” said Dr. Mehraneh Dorna Jafari, an assistant professor of surgery at the University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine. She and her colleagues published a study that found that of the 100 doctors who received the most compensation from device makers in 2015, conflicts were disclosed in only 37 percent of the articles published in the next year.
Source propublica

Some Fish Are Extremely High in Mercury
The amount of mercury in fish and other seafood depends on the species and the levels of pollution in its environment.
One study from 1998 to 2005 found that 27% of fish from 291 streams around the United States contained more than the recommended limit.
Source healthline.com

Irradiated Food
The truth is that we aren’t entirely sure how potentially toxic, irradiated food is. According to the Organic Consumers Association, the longest human feeding study on record lasted fifteen weeks. And other than a small, questionable Indian study, none have demonstrated the effects of feeding babies or children diets consisting of irradiated foods. Without extensive, long-term investigation, we can't know how safe these foods are, specifically the safety of URP’s (especially the effects of 2-ACB on humans) and other chemical by-products, as well as the cumulative effects of diets heavy on irradiated food.
Source eluxe magazine

Pesticide-dependent food system
We have just an abundance of scientific research now that demonstrates how this pesticide-dependent food system—which genetically engineered crops are tied to, to a degree—causes harmful impacts, even though the companies sold this to us as environmentally friendly, sustainable agriculture. The science has caught up and demonstrated that while there were some gains for some farmers on a short-term basis, the long-term sustainability is not there.
Source civileats.com

Glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic to humans,"
A study published in the journal Environmental Sciences Europe reveals that Americans have applied 1.8 million tons of glyphosate since its introduction in 1974. Worldwide, 9.4 million tons of the chemical have been sprayed onto fields.
And it's troubling, considering that in March 2015 the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer unanimously determined that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic to humans,"
Source newsweek

Health And Environmental Impact From Genetically Modified Foods
More than 80% of all genetically modified crops grown worldwide have been engineered for herbicide tolerance. As a result, the use of toxic herbicides, such as Roundup®, has increased fifteenfold since GMOs were first introduced. Genetically modified crops also are responsible for the emergence of “superweeds” and “superbugs,” which can only be killed with ever more toxic poisons such as 2,4-D (a major ingredient in Agent Orange).
Source nongmoproject

The Dangers of the Medical Industrial Complex
YOUR DOCTORS THINK they make decisions based on medical evidence.
But they don't!
In fact, half of medical evidence is hidden from your doctors.
Source drhyman.com

An array of pharmaceuticals - including antibiotics, anticonvulsants, mood stabilizers, and sex hormones - have been found in the drinking water supplies of at least 41 million Americans, an Associated Press investigation found. The presence of so many prescription drugs - and over-the-counter medicines like acetaminophen and ibuprofen - in so much of our drinking water is heightening worries among scientists of long-term consequences to human health. In the course of a five-month inquiry, the AP discovered that drugs have been detected in the drinking water supplies of 24 major metropolitan areas - from southern California to northern New Jersey, from Detroit to Louisville, Ky. 
Source boston.com

“Coronary artery disease is virtually absent in cultures that eat plant-based diets
In a 21-year Cleveland Clinic study led by Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Jr., MD, advanced CAD was stopped and reversed in patients who complied with a plant-based diet and maintained a total cholesterol of less than 150 mg/dL and an LDL-cholesterol of less than 80 mg/dL.
“Coronary artery disease is virtually absent in cultures that eat plant-based diets, such as the Tarahumara Indians of northern Mexico, the Papua highlanders of New Guinea, and the inhabitants of rural China and central Africa,” wrote Dr. Esselstyn in Preventive Cardiology. “Hundreds of thousands of rural Chinese go for years without a single documented myocardial infarction.”
Source doctorsthatdo.org

In 1860, the average age of the onset of puberty in girls was 16.6 years. In 1920, it was 14.6; in 1950, 13.1; 1980, 12.5; and in 2010, it had dropped to 10.5.
In 1860, the average age of the onset of puberty in girls was 16.6 years. In 1920, it was 14.6; in 1950, 13.1; 1980, 12.5; and in 2010, it had dropped to 10.5. Similar sets of figures have been reported for boys, albeit with a delay of around a year
Source The Guardian

Is This the Beginning of the End for Quality Supplements?
Consumers who care about supplement access must be on alert and stay engaged in this process, given the agency’s demonstrated hostility towards the natural products industry.
Source Alliance for Natural Health

Vitamin B12 deficiency can be sneaky, harmful
Over the course of two months, a 62-year-old man developed numbness and a “pins and needles” sensation in his hands, had trouble walking, experienced severe joint pain, began turning yellow, and became progressively short of breath. The cause was lack of vitamin B12 in his bloodstream, according to a case report from Harvard-affiliated Massachusetts General Hospital published in The New England Journal of Medicine. It could have been worse—a severe vitamin B12 deficiency can lead to deep depression, paranoia and delusions, memory loss, incontinence, loss of taste and smell, and more.
Source Harvard Health Publishing Harvard Medical School

Water FLUORIDATION
In Europe, only Ireland (73%), Poland (1%), Serbia (3%), Spain (11%), and the U.K. (11%) fluoridate any of their water. Most developed countries, including Japan and 97% of the western European population, do not consume fluoridated water.
Source fluoridealert.org

Top 10 Facts About Cell Phones And Wi-Fi
Every wireless device is actually a two-way microwave radio that sends and receives a type of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation called radio frequency radiation RF – EMF. This machine-made radiation is millions of times higher than the natural electromagnetic fields (EMFs) our grandparents were exposed to.
Numerous peer reviewed published research studies shows that these made-made pulsed electromagnetic frequencies cause adverse biological effects and are very different than the natural electromagnetic fields that have existed in the environment for years. Research on humans has found an association between cell phone use and serious effects such as brain cancer, headaches, damage to the brain and immune system.
Source ehtrust.org

Environmental Issues
The Planet is Warming
18 of the 19 warmest years all have occurred since 2001, with the exception of 1998.
The (piping hot) numbers are in: 2018 was the fourth hottest year on record, according to two independent reports released today (Feb. 6) by NASA and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Last year was so hot that global land- and ocean-surface temperatures were 1.42 degrees Fahrenheit (0.79 degrees Celsius) above the 20th-century average, NOAA reported. Since 1880, when record-keeping began, only three years — 2016 (the highest, in part because of El Niño), 2015 and 2017 — were hotter.
"The key message is that the planet is warming," Gavin Schmidt, the director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City, told reporters at a news conference. "And our understanding of why those trends are occurring is also very robust. It's because of the greenhouse gases that we['ve] put into the atmosphere over the last 100 years." [6 Unexpected Effects of Climate Change]
The trend isn't a new one. Nine of the 10 warmest winters have happened since 2005, and five of the warmest years on record happened within the last five years, or from 2014 to 2018.
Source livescience.com

Species Extinction Rates ‘Accelerating’
UN Report: Nature’s Dangerous Decline ‘Unprecedented’; Species Extinction Rates ‘Accelerating’
Most comprehensive assessment of its kind;
1,000,000 species threatened with extinction
Nature is declining globally at rates unprecedented in human history – and the rate of species extinctions is accelerating, with grave impacts on people around the world now likely, warns a landmark new report from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), “
Source United Nations Report

Ocean Acidification
Ocean acidity has increased by 30% since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. This increase is 100 times faster than any change in acidity experienced by marine organisms for at least the last 20 million years. Ocean acidification may threaten plankton, which forms the base of the marine food chain; it is key to the survival of larger fish.
Source unesco.org

Global Fish Stocks Depleted to 'Alarming' Levels
Global Fish Stocks Depleted to 'Alarming' Levels
If we keep pulling fish out of our waterways at this rate, we're going to run out of fish. The Guardian has revealed that due to vast overfishing, nearly 90 percent of global fish stocks are either fully fished or overfished, based on a new analysis from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
Source Ecowatch

Half of the topsoil on the planet has been lost in the last 150 years.
Soil that is able to generate viable crops is rapidly on the decline, according to senior UN official Helena Semedo. Half of the topsoil on the planet has been lost in the last 150 years, and it can take decades, if not centuries, to regenerate. Numbers suggest only 60 years of viable topsoil left at the current rate of degradation and increased usage.
Source planetexperts.com

By 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population may face water shortages
Many of the water systems that keep ecosystems thriving and feed a growing human population have become stressed. Rivers, lakes and aquifers are drying up or becoming too polluted to use. More than half the world’s wetlands have disappeared. Agriculture consumes more water than any other source and wastes much of that through inefficiencies. Climate change is altering patterns of weather and water around the world, causing shortages and droughts in some areas and floods in others. At the current consumption rate, this situation will only get worse. By 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population may face water shortages. And ecosystems around the world will suffer even more.
Source rainforest-alliance.org

Global wildlife has declined 60 percent since 1970
The World Wildlife Fund’s 2018 Living Planet report demonstrates a global wildlife population loss of 60 percent between 1970 and 2014. The report, which tracks over 4,000 species of mammals, birds, fish, reptiles and amphibians, is published every two years. “Earth is losing biodiversity at a rate seen only during mass extinctions,” the report says.
Source wildlife.org

Humanity has wiped out 60% of mammals, birds, fish and reptiles since 1970, leading the world’s foremost experts to warn that the annihilation of wildlife is now an emergency that threatens civilization.
Humanity has wiped out 60% of mammals, birds, fish and reptiles since 1970, leading the world’s foremost experts to warn that the annihilation of wildlife is now an emergency that threatens civilization.
Source The Guardian

Plummeting insect numbers 'threaten collapse of nature
The world’s insects are hurtling down the path to extinction, threatening a “catastrophic collapse of nature’s ecosystems”, according to the first global scientific review.
More than 40% of insect species are declining and a third are endangered, the analysis found.
Source The Guardian

Climate change could trigger a global food crisis, new U.N. report says
If climate change is left unchecked, rising temperatures, extreme weather and land degradation could trigger a global food crisis, according to a report released by a United Nations panel.
Source NBC News

More than 90 percent of crop varieties have disappeared from farmers’ fields
More than 90 percent of crop varieties have disappeared from farmers’ fields; half of the breeds of many domestic animals have been lost. In fisheries, all the world’s 17 main fishing grounds are now being fished at or above their sustainable limits, with many fish populations effectively becoming extinct. Loss of forest cover, coastal wetlands, other ‘wild’ uncultivated areas, and the destruction of the aquatic environment exacerbate the genetic erosion of agrobiodiversity.
Source fao.org

Study claims meat creates half of all greenhouse gases
Livestock causes far more climate damage than first thought, says report
Climate change emissions from meat production are far higher than currently estimated, according to a controversial new study that will fuel the debate on whether people should eat fewer animal products to help the environment. In a paper published by a respected US thinktank, the Worldwatch Institute, two World Bank environmental advisers claim that instead of 18 per cent of global emissions being caused by meat, the true figure is 51 per cent.
Source independent.co.

The World’s Pollinators Are Dying Out, And All Our Favourite Foods Could Go With Them
The first global assessment of pollinators ever has found that extinction pressures on species that facilitate crop production are threatening the world’s food supply, with hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of food and agricultural production annually at stake.
Source sciencealert.com

Tropical coral reef coverage around the world has declined by 30 to 50 percent since the 1980s. Nearly 75 percent of the world’s reefs face threats from pollution, habitat destruction, overfishing and, increasingly, a changing climate that increases temperatures, sea level, and acidity in the oceans.
Tropical coral reef coverage around the world has declined by 30 to 50 percent since the 1980s. Nearly 75 percent of the world’s reefs face threats from pollution, habitat destruction, overfishing and, increasingly, a changing climate that increases temperatures, sea level, and acidity in the oceans.
Source pbs.org

Forests around the world are under threat, The main cause of deforestation is agriculture
Forests around the world are under threat. The threats manifest themselves in the form of deforestation and forest degradation. The main cause of deforestation is agriculture (poorly planned infrastructure is emerging as a big threat too) and the main cause of forest degradation is illegal logging. We’re losing 18.7 million acres of forests annually, equivalent to 27 soccer fields every minute.
Source worldwildlife.org

As global temperatures rise and the human population expands, more of the planet is vulnerable to desertification, the permanent degradation of land that was once arable.
As global temperatures rise and the human population expands, more of the planet is vulnerable to desertification, the permanent degradation of land that was once arable. While land degradation has occurred throughout history, the pace has accelerated, reaching 30 to 35 times the historical rate, according to the United Nations. More than 75 percent of Earth's land area is already degraded, according to the European Commission's World Atlas of Desertification, and more than 90 percent could become degraded by 2050.
Source worldwildlife.org

Factory farms pollute the environment and our drinking water, ravage rural communities, and harm the welfare of animals—while increasing corporate control over our food.
Factory farms pollute the environment and our drinking water, ravage rural communities, and harm the welfare of animals—while increasing corporate control over our food.
Source Food and Water Watch

Wild animals are being poached on a massive scale
WILD ANIMALS ARE being poached on a massive scale, with millions of individual animals of thousands of species worldwide killed or captured from their native habitats. Poaching poses a growing threat to elephants, rhinos, and other charismatic animals, as well as to smaller and more obscure creatures, like certain lizards and monkeys.
Source National Geographic

Sea Level Rise
When sea levels rise as rapidly as they have been, even a small increase can have devastating effects on coastal habitats farther inland, it can cause destructive erosion, wetland flooding, aquifer and agricultural soil contamination with salt, and lost habitat for fish, birds, and plants.
Source National Geographic

Seed diversity is disappearing — and 3 chemical companies own more than half. Our food security hinges on the struggle now underway over who controls the earth’s seeds
Our food security hinges on the struggle now underway over who controls the earth’s seeds
Source salon.com

Extinction of Wildlife.There are half as many African lions than there were 25 years ago.
There are half as many African lions than there were 25 years ago.
The iconic species has disappeared from 94 percent of its historic range
Source National Geographic

How climate change effects extreme weather around the world
Scientists have published more than 230 peer-reviewed studies looking at weather events around the world, from Hurricane Katrina to Russia’s 2010 heatwave. The result is mounting evidence that human activity is raising the risk of some types of extreme weather, especially those linked to heat.
Carbon Brief’s analysis suggests 68% of all extreme weather events studied to date were made more likely or more severe by human-caused climate change.
Source www.carbonbrief.org

Ocean Dead Zones from extreme overuse of toxic chemicals from farms and Confined Animal Feeding Operations
Largest-Ever Gulf Dead Zone Reveals Stark Impacts of Industrial Agriculture
A new survey of the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico sounds alarm and points to extreme overuse of toxic chemicals from farms and CAFOs.
Source civileats.com

Aquaculture(Fish Farming) and its long-term effects on fish, people, and other animals
key facts about farmed fish.
1 - The nutritional benefits of fish are greatly decreased when it’s farmed.
2 - Tuna and salmon, for example, need to eat up to five pounds of fish for each pound of body weight. The result is that prey (fish like anchovies and herring) are being fished to the brink of extinction to feed the world’s fish farms. “We have caught all the big fish and now we are going after their food,” says the non-profit Oceana, which blames aquaculture’s voracious hunger for declines of whales, dolphins, seals, sea lions, tuna, bass, salmon, albatross, penguins, and other species.
3 - Farmed fish are loaded with disease, and this spreads to wild fish populations.
4 - Farmed fish are packed as tightly as coins in a purse, with twenty-seven adult trout, for example, typically scrunched into a bathtub-sized space. These unnatural conditions give rise to diseases and parasites, which often migrate off the farm and infect wild fish populations.
5. Fish farms are rife with toxins, which also damage local ecosystems.
6. Farmed fish are living in their own feces.
7. Farmed fish are always trying to escape their unpleasant conditions, and who can blame them?
8. As aquaculture makes fish production increasingly efficient, and fish become more widely available and less expensive, demand increases across the board.
9. When the heavy environmental damage they cause is taken into account, fish farming operations often are found to generate more costs than revenues.
Source wellnessmama.com

Risks and Concerns of Hydraulic Fracturing
Risks and Concerns of Fracking
Contamination of groundwater
Methane pollution and its impact on climate change
Air pollution impacts
Exposure to toxic chemicals
Blowouts due to gas explosion
Waste disposal
Large volume water use in water-deficient regions
Fracking-induced earthquakes
Workplace safety
Infrastructure degradation
Source of Fracking Contamination
Source serc.carleton.edu

Overuse Of Land Due To Meat Production
75 percent of the world’s agricultural land goes into meat production
Taking into account the amount of cropland devoted to feedstock, an estimated 75 percent of the world’s agricultural land goes into meat production. Meat production is also extremely water-intensive; producing one pound of meat requires between 5,000 and 20,000 liters of water, while producing one pound of wheat requires much less—between 500 and 4,000 liters.
Source Population Connection

Meat production requires a much higher amount of water than vegetables
Meat production requires a much higher amount of water than vegetables. IME state that to produce 1kg of meat requires between 5,000 and 20,000 litres of water whereas to produce 1kg of wheat requires between 500 and 4,000 litres of water.
Source The Guardian

The major news and media outlets are almost all owned by just six conglomerates.
While independent media outlets still exist (and there are a lot of them), the major outlets are almost all owned by just six conglomerates.
Source Webfx

Scientific Authors with financial relationships with corporate sponsors
Science and Money: Problems and Solutions
Three systematic reviews of over 40 publications examining the relationship between sources of funding and research outcomes found that studies with industry funding were more likely to report results that favored the company’s products than studies with independent sources of funding.
Source US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health

How the Growth of Monoculture Crops Is Destroying our Planet and Still Leaving us Hungry
a monoculture is a single crop repeatedly grown on the same land.So why are these food sources at risk in addition to the harm being done to the environment? Well, to start, when one crop is planted repeatedly on the same land, certain nutrients become depleted from the soil due to the crop’s specific nutrient demand. In fact, the Earth’s soil is depleting at more than 13 percent the rate at which it can be replaced. which is scary because approximately 75 percent of the world’s crop varieties have been lost over the last 100 years as a result. This time frame corresponds roughly to the beginning of monoculture farming, which is dated back to 1901.
Source One Green Planet

Mountaintop removal coal mining, often described as "strip mining on steroids," is an extremely destructive form of mining
An area the size of Delaware has been flattened. Local coal field communities routinely face devastating floods and adverse health effects. Natural habitats in some our country's oldest forests are laid to waste.
Source Earthjustice

Nuclear Power
Nuclear power comes with plenty of other risks that aren't so obvious: the hazards of uranium mining, the fouled water, and the radioactive waste.
Source grist.org

The Politician Who Spends The Most Money Wins 86% Of The Time
How strong is the association between campaign spending and political success? For House seats, more than 90 percent of candidates who spend the most win. From 2000 through 2016, there was only one election cycle where that wasn't true: 2010. “In that election, 86 percent of the top spenders won,”
Source fivethirtyeight.com

Can we email or call with questions about the membership club?
Yes, info@realtruthtalks.com or 516-921-1417. Thank you for taking the time to hear what we had to say.


598 Broad Hollow Road Melville, N.Y. Hilton Hotel

100% FREE TO ATTEND IN PERSON OR ONLINE

Date: January 24 – February 2, 2020 
9:00 AM - 9:30 PM EST Daily

Free Vegan Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner and Ice cream 
Served Daily
        

The information and opinions expressed in this website and during our conferences include general discussions designed for educational purposes only. The information is not intended to substitute for medical advice or care. The opinions of our speakers and experts may not apply to you individually, and you should not use this information to diagnose or treat any health condition or illness without consulting your licensed physician first. Please consult a doctor with any questions or concerns you might have regarding your or your child's condition. TheRealTruthAboutHealthConference.com does not manufacture or distribute any commercial products, any reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement or recommendation by TheRealTruthAboutHealthConference.com.
Powered By ClickFunnels.com